web 2.0 (3)
Web 2.0:
a large bag with so different feelings and philosophies.
Can "subversive" concepts become institutional?
Can those tools and techniques, reflects of self image, with a total appropriation (what do I do now..., my specific passions and friends..., it's happening now..., my special tricky way to access information...,), become a common practice for everybody?
Will people seek contact and networks or go back to CAN (Computer aided narcissism) ? This one open the question.
That can explain this "war", within organizations, to make Web 2.0 a mainstream. Why this fear for web 2.0?
At the same time, Web 2.0 becomes global...
...And a very good clever blog by Internet visionary Tim O'Reilly, the man credited with creating the term Web 2.0
Fantastic video to re-stimulate your minds (if necessary).
A Microsoft research using photos of real or virtual objects "scraped from around the Web, creating multidimensional spaces with zoom and navigation features that outstrip all expectation".
Some short thoughts on that:
- This idea of making real hyperlinks between photos, videos open the question: Who code the links? who makes the relations. To day the "machine" is still a bit unable to do that (image semantic recognition...)
- Real life vs Web virtual life. Have we so much time?
Good back to real school and/or to real life after a long summer...
I just recently found this David Weinberger fantastic presentation video (alerted by Tony Karrer blog).
Very close of my way of thinking. I really love it (content, style, ideology).
A bit long (57 mn) but no feeling of time looking at it!
...I permanently have a difficult relation with order (who defines the order? why, for which reason...), I like freedom of choice in existentialist way (and without illusion, knowing internal and external determinisms...).
...I prefer Google search "non classification" than hierarchical access to data (even on my PC).
Thanks David for this exciting stimulation (found naturally randomly on the web ...)